2023 Questionnaire Report

A. Number of Questionnaire Respondents

Student Respondents

Alumni Respondents

B. Student Questionnaire

Faculty of Engineering Student Satisfaction Level (Table 5.C)

(A) RELIABILITY: the ability of lecturers, education staff and managers to provide services.
(B) RESPONSIVE POWER: the willingness of lecturers, education staff and administrators to help students and provide services quickly.
(C) CERTAINTY: the ability of lecturers, staff & managers to give students confidence that the services provided are in accordance with the provisions.
(D) EMPATHY: willingness/concern of lecturers, staff and administrators to pay attention to students.
(E) TANGIBLE: student assessment of adequacy, accessibility, quality of facilities and infrastructure.

Level of Understanding of VMTS of Faculty of Engineering Students

C. Lecturer Questionnaire

Level of Lecturer Satisfaction of Faculty of Engineering

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT
CAREER/POSITION DEVELOPMENT
RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC WORK
COMMUNITY SERVICE
FINANCIAL SERVICES, FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Level of Understanding of VMTS Lecturers of the Faculty of Engineering

D. Educational Personnel Questionnaire

Level of Satisfaction of Faculty of Engineering Education Staff

COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT
CAREER/POSITION DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL SERVICES, FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Level of Understanding of VMTS of Faculty of Engineering Education Personnel




E. Graduate User Questionnaire

User Satisfaction Level of Faculty of Engineering Graduates

F. Collaboration Partner Questionnaire

Go to Top